From what I understand about standard or mundane hypnotism, it can be used to lure a person willingly into a restful state which is commonly called a "trance." While in this trance, the subject is entirely focused on the voice of the hypnotist and is open to taking certain suggestions. Once these suggestions are received, they can be enacted or triggered upon command. There are, however, some drawbacks to the usefulness of this.
Where it is true that hypnotism could potentially bring out a persons more suppressed or hidden qualities, there are still a great many things a person cannot be hypnotized to do. These things are those of which break a person's moral code. If you command a person within a hypnotic state to cluck like a chicken before a large number of people, they will most likely do it, since performing that act does not break any sort of personal morals. It is, even so, a very humiliating thing to go through, but being embarrassed goes nowhere near attacking a person's personal conscience.
Now, let's say that I command my entranced subject to pick up a gun and shoot someone else in the audience. They might go so far as to pick up the gun, point it at his target, but pulling the trigger will likely not occur. In fact, they may not even get that far. Upon receiving the command, they might just simply say that they won't kill another person, this being while still under the hypnotic trance. In the world of which I get much of my information from, hypnosis is 100% consensual; the subject cannot be forced to break their own moral code. That said, if the person does ultimately go through killing the person [I suggest not actually having the gun loaded just in case], that would mean that the person does not actually have a problem with killing another person. There is no moral code to stop him, only a set of laws, and laws don't really play a part in hypnosis.
The term aggressive hypnosis is a creation of fantasy. It is also a very real thing that exists within my multiverse. If a person is competent in the action of hypnosis, he can impose his will upon the mind of another. Once under the trance, that person is entirely subject to the whims of his hypnotist. Nothing is off the table. The subject could, perhaps, have the will to overcome the hypnosis itself, but aside from that, he becomes nothing but an extension of his master's will and ego.
It seems to me that aggressive hypnosis has more value than that of the standard variety. One character that I have seen many times over within my worlds is a certain bat named Anthony. He is the best example of an aggressive hypnotist. He goes out of his way to bend, not only people, but the entire world to his will. His methods seem to change from story to story, but his evil desires seem to remain a constant. Anthony wants power, and he is perfectly happy to subdue the minds of the innocence in order to gain and keep that power.
The concept of aggressive hypnotism seems to have made its way into a lot of fantasy. It has also been the main theme of a peculiar video game I ran into the other day. The game is called HYPNOSCREEN. Although the game makes it very clear that it is a fetish game intended for adults, the theme of it is that the person playing it is hypnotized and controlled by the developers who created the game. I played the game for about an hour and twenty minutes but was less than satisfied with the results... yet I could see what the game was trying to do.
I then placed Vixxie in front of my laptop and told her to play HYPNOSCREEN until I told her to stop. For the first thirty minutes, she seemed quite bored. She was playing it, however. Her finger was constantly clicking the mouse button as she stared at the ubiquitous hypnotic rings rolling out upon the screen.
At about the fifty minute mark, I said her name... and she did not respond to me. I moved closer to her ear and tried again, and she only twitched a bit as if aggravated. Mind you, she was actually still playing the game. She was clicking constantly and playing around with the options of the game, but this was the first time she out rightly ignored me.
I placed my hand over hers where it lay on the mouse. This produced a reaction. She looked at me. Vixxie seemed sleepy and a little confused at what was happening. I chose not to say anything and slowly moved away. She resumed her clicking.
I pulled up a chair and simply watched her play the game for another hour. There were some very simple little games that she was asked to accomplish. Some she passed and some she failed, but the game continued to assure her that she was doing well. Through all this, she said nothing and moved nothing but her arm and index finger.
After nearly two hours, I removed her hand from the mouse and chose an option built within the game that should wake her up. The process ran, and for the first time, she looked at me willingly and said, "I feel like having sex." I naturally obliged.
Upon looking into the development of this game, I do not think it was intended for the world I live in. It did not seem to be built upon aggressive-style hypnosis. However, within my world, it has an unusual power. Vixxie was incredibly drawn into it, so that I could not even speak to her. Her post-hypnotic arousal was actually her fault. There was a setting in the game that she had tweaked to bombard her senses with filthy, sexual words on the subliminal level. I had nothing to do with it. It was her own curiosity that led her to do it.
I have taken quite a large number of notes on the matter and intend to perfect the idea of aggressive hypnotism within my multiverse. Vixxie shall be my subject. Strangely Clara has volunteered as well out of curiosity, but I do not know how difficult it would be to hypnotize a demon living inside of a plush animal. Either way, I'll try my best.
For now, I'll leave you with a promotion for the final of the four Lust Bearer books, "The Temptations of Pan. Here is some information to help you out:
